Residents of
the Dimond district will remain united in District 4
under the city's latest redistricting plan, and
they're hoping to use this political strength to help
them solve the area's transportation woes.
Persuaded by Dimond residents and City Councilwoman
Jean Quan of District 4, District 5 Councilman Ignacio
De La Fuente agreed last Tuesday to keep the lower
Dimond in District 4 -- a move that pushed the
council's final vote on the city's new political
boundaries back by two weeks to April 29.
De La Fuente's decision not to move Dimond into
District 5, as he and councilman Larry Reid had
proposed last month, came after some 40 residents of
the neighborhood made their case last week to maintain
a "community of interest," rather than
divide it.
"No matter how much (Quan) would have pushed,
it was up to De la Fuente to listen and recognize the
Dimond as a community of interest," said Arturo
Sanchez, a policy analyst for District 4 Councilwoman
Quan,.
At a March 31 meeting hosted by De La Fuente and
Quan, residents spoke of efforts related to Dimond
Park, the Sausal Creek watershed and the importance of
a unified business district.
"I don't see this as a compromise," De la
Fuente said. "I see it as arguments that make
sense."
The latest redistricting plan also reunites the
Glenview neighborhood, which has been divided between
district 2 and 4 along Park Boulevard for the past 10
years. Glenview will become part of District 5, if the
council approves the plan later this month, as
expected. This would move District 5 above (or north
of) the I-580 freeway for the first time.
The latest plan keeps Canon Avenue from Wellington
Street to MacArthur Boulevard, and the area south of
I-580 between Champion and School streets -- including
Fruitvale Elementary School -- in District 4.
Many Dimond residents had feared that dividing the
area between two district would "marginalize
it," according to Chris Burmester co-chair of the
Dimond Improvement Association. The area has seen some
economic development and neighborhood improvements
recently, and more plans are in the works that may
benefit from unification, Burmester said.
Businesses moved into many of Dimond's vacant
commercial spaces last year, and residents convinced
Safeway management, which was planning to close the
grocery store, to remodel it instead. A Subway
sandwich shop moved to the intersection of MacArthur
Boulevard and Fruitvale Avenue. And neighbors expect
the former Albertson's site to be filled shortly.
Dimond residents also have been hard at work on
another ambitious project -- a plan to qualify the
area for Metropolitan Transportation Commission
funding. The plan involves more
"streetscape" improvements, bus shelters and
a bike route. The bike route would connect to the
well-established bike path on MacArthur that runs
through the Laurel district.
The plans would cost $15,000-30,000 to develop,
Burmester said, which Dimond residents hope the city
will help them fund. Eventually, they want to get some
$1.2 million from MTC.
"In an odd way, the redistricting process made
us think about what our community is and made us
realize that we share issues with Glenview," he
explained.
"My experience is that council is responsive
to an organized group," Burmester said. "But
in a symbolic way (uniting the Dimond) makes the
community feel united, which further fuels the renewal
of the district."