|
OAKLAND
-- Ballots will be mailed to hills residents
Friday asking them if they are willing to pay a
$65 annual assessment for vegetation management
to prevent fires.
The
mass mailing to thousands of people comes on the
heels of Tuesday night's City Council decision
to form a special Oakland hills Wildfire
Assessment District. The council first needed to
pass a resolution forming the district before
ballots could be mailed.
The
ballots must be returned to City Hall by Jan. 6.
A majority of the hills voters must approve the
district.
City
Council and Oakland Fire Department officials
worked with hills residents for about six months
before Tuesday's vote to devise a plan to
replace vegetation management services cut from
next year's city budget.
Neighborhood
activists formed the Keep Oakland Fire Safe
committee to promote the special assessment
district. Committee member Ken Benson said for
the cost equivalent of three extra-large pizzas,
hills residents can buy a comprehensive
vegetation management program that could prevent
a fire.
"It
will be a safer place to be, a well-managed
place to be, a more beautiful place to be,"
he said.
The
assessment district will pay for goat grazing in
the hills, roving fire patrols on high-fire
danger days, neighborhood wood-chipping programs
and other services.
The
Oakland and Berkeley hills were the site of a
deadly and destructive 1991 firestorm that
burned 3,000 structures and killed 25 people.
Opposition
to the tax is small. Some opponents say hills
residents should not be the only ones paying for
fire prevention services that benefit the entire
city. Others said the tax will maintain services
that are shoddy at best.
"We
are totally ill prepared for a fire," hills
resident David Mix said. He chastised the
council for trying to raise money for vegetation
management programs while cutting the city's
fire department budget.
He
said a comprehensive fire prevention plan should
include the University of California and East
Bay Regional Parks property in the hills, which
this does not.
Members
of Friends of Sausal Creek, an organization that
protects natural resources in the creek
watershed, criticized the district for not
dealing with highly flammable eucalyptus and
Monterey pine trees.
They
say goats used in the vegetation management
program contribute to erosion and destroy
endangered native plants.
They
also complain those contracted to cut vegetation
are not trained to avoid native plants and crews
have destroyed half of the Sausal Creek
watershed's pallid manzanitas.
Councilmember
Jean Quan (Montclair-Laurel) said her staff is
working to identify naturalists who might want
to be on the assessment district advisory board.
She
said training of goat shepherds and vegetation
management crews to avoid the taking of native
plants is possible.
"They're
raising some legitimate issues but it's
something we can start on even before it's
passed," Quan said.
Perhaps
the greatest challenge for the district will be
to make all voters aware the ballots are coming
in the mail and have them turned in by the
deadline.
Jayne
Becker, assistant to Interim City Manager
Deborah Edgerly, said the mailers will clearly
indicate they are ballots for the Wildfire
Prevention Assessment District.
"I
think there's a lot of interest in it and I hope
people do return their ballots right away before
they forget about them or lose them,"
Becker said.
If
a voter loses, throws away or changes his or her
mind about a vote, they should call Joe
Francisco at339-3092 to receive a new ballot.
A
final City Council hearing about the assessment
district will be Jan. 6. The ballots will be
tabulated Jan. 7 and 8 at City Hall.
|